Major Theories of Crime Causation Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Major Theories of Crime causality - Term Paper ExampleCultural deviance theory is a subset of a bigger kitchen stove of theories which all have to do with the structure, or more exactly, the stratification of human society. Stratification is the way that objects ar arranged in layers, such as in ancient rock formations, for example, and in society the status refers to the economic or social classes that exist in human societies. There ar always some(a) people who have a lot of wealth and power, and these people represent the upper classes. They enjoy prestige and privileged irritate to many of the benefits of society. Below this layer are those who are comfortable and can access some but not all of the advantages that a society offers, and at the understructure of the heap are the poor, who very often struggle to meet basic needs and are excluded from many of the benefits of society. The proportion of the existence in each stratum can vary according to the culture and the his tory of varied places. near countries, like the USA and most of Western Europe has a very large middle class, man others, like India, have a huge lower class. In all societies it has been noted that the classes at the bottom of this hierarchy tend to have more crime. Economic disadvantage, therefore, is a factor which can lead to greater levels of crime. Lack of wealth results in an environment where people do not have the spare income to miss on keeping the place in order, and this means that disorganization and chaos is more likely to occur. kernel and upper class communities take more pride in their local area because they have invested a lot of resources in their homes, for example in buying or renting nice properties and making their gardens and houses fresh and clean. People who struggle to put food on the table do not have the prodigality to look after their neighbourhood, and crime develops in the neglected public spaces. In this context there is frequently less to l ose, and so there is a greater tendency to opt out of constructive partnership efforts. People do not become attached to the place, or their neighbors and in fact Residents in crime-ridden neighborhoods emphasize to leave at the earliest opportunity. (Siegel, 2007, p. 126) Life in an economically disadvantaged area is stressful and results in a culture forming in which those who are not able to move out and up into a more advantageous layer of society find ways of adapting to their environment. The cultural disadvantage theory observes that blue-collar people have different values than middle and upper class people. They do not translate to compete in conventional arenas like education and employment, but seek success in different ways, and measured by different standards. So for example instead of working through an apprenticeship and starting a long term career, lower class people set their sights on the values of the street beingness tough and streetwise, doing deals and gai ning income in ways which demand street wisdom rather than conventional submission to rules. The uncouth authority figures such as parents, teachers, police, are seen as influences to be rejected, in favor of a genial of rebellious autonomy. In this world view crime plays a big part, because